New Page 1
 

LAHORE HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION

 


History Of Bar

FOREWORD

 

 It is a matter of distinction that we have been elected to the hundredth session of the Lahore High Court Bar Association, which is the first Institution of lawyers in Pakistan to complete its hundred years of existence. This Bar Association is regarded as the premier Bar of the Country. Since 1947, it has been the centre stage of the activities of the lawyers in Pakistan. It is a matter of great pride for this Bar Association that the founder of Pakistan, Quaid-e-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah, had occasion to grace its premises when he appeared in a matter before the Lahore High Court. It can also proudly count as a Member, Allama Mohammad Iqbal, the great poet and philosopher.

 The Bar has rendered invaluable services to the cause of democracy, rule of law, independence of judiciary, freedom of speech and press, and promotion of fundamental rights and civil liberties. It withstood resolutely all oppressive regimes in Pakistan. Its members have offered and rendered free legal aid to suffering humanity and the politically oppressed. its history is replete with self-sacrifice, courage, determination and perseverance, particularly in the face of adversity. It has raised its collective voice, fearlessly and selflessly, on major issues of national and international importance. The Lahore High Court Bar Association can look back with pride on its past and can look forward to continue its glorious traditions in its present century.

 

 

BRIEF HISTORY OF THE LAHORE HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION, LAHORE

 

In a modern society, dispensation of justice is complicated, rather cumbrous. the legal machinery has many components but the two most important are Courts of Justice and Bars. Both are complementary to each other. If one dispenses justice, the other facilitates it. One redresses the wrong done to the weak, the other serves as a defender of his basic rights. One raises a high and imposing image, the other provides material and wherewithal to raise it. 

A Bar in its correct posture not only maintains and embellishes the dignity and prestige of a Court of Justice, and lends it help in doing even-handed justice, but it also reflects in its activities and functioning, the struggles, urges, fears and aspirations of a people. 

The role of the High Court Bar Association at Lahore, the paramount organization of the legal profession in the country, has been exactly the same.

 

HISTORY

 

The earliest trace of the Lahore Bar as a body to be acknowledged and accepted starts from 1882. In October, 1882, the Judges of the Chief Court passed Resolution requesting Mr. C. H. Spitta, Barrister-at-Law (then a leading member of the legal fraternity and later to become a temporary judge of the Chief Court) to convince a Special Meeting of the Bar, to devise measures to root out touting. In compliance with this Resolution, Mr. C. H. Spitta convened a meeting of the Lahore Bar on 22nd November, 1882, in the Bar Room and at which five Barristers and thirteen Pleaders attended. The meeting was presided by Mr. C. H. Spitta. At the meeting, ten resolutions to root out touting were passed by the Lahore Bar and their copies transmitted to the Registrar of the Chief Court, for his attention. These were received and under the orders of the Judges, circulated by the Chief Court to all the Commissioners and Superintendents of the various Divisions for compliance. 

Apart from the above, there is no further evidence of the Lahore Bar till 1892-93. Out of the Association’s available records, the register containing the Minutes of the earliest General Meetings of the Chief Court Bar Association starts from the year 1893. The file dealing with the subject “Touts-High Court” amongst the High Court’s records, contains the copy of a letter addressed to the Secretary of the Bar Association in 1892 and his seems to be the earliest letter traceable from the various High Court files addressed to the legal fraternity practicing in the Chief court in its capacity as an Association. 

From these items of evidence, it can fairly be inferred that the Lahore Bar assumed some maturity by 1882 and became an entity which commanded attention and to which the Chief Court had to look to for assistance. But the Lahore Bar as a collective group or entity took birth somewhere after 1882 and before 1892-93. 

In 1910 the Executive Committee recommended that the Chief Court Bar Association should be registered and that the Secretary should take necessary steps for this purpose. The General House in its meeting held on 9th June 1910, accepted the recommendations of the Committee.

 

 

LIBRARY

 

The Association maintains a library which can be ranked as second to none. It is stated that one Hon’ble Judge, who happened to be a President of the High Court Bar Association prior to Independence, at one stage remarked that when he was the President, he had received requests for extracts from law books from other High Courts. 

The Association’s Library, which has been built up carefully and systematically over the course of years, contains books on almost every conceivable legal subject. Before 1976 the main Library Hall with its alcoves, the Study Room, the Gallery above the library and a part of the rear verandah adjacent to the Study Room were all full of almirahs containing books. There was so much congestion in the Gallery that many books were laying on the ground, picking up dust. After 1976, the new library in the basement, which is sufficiently large, presents a neat appearance.

 

THE PRESIDENT AND THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

 

The High Court Bar Association, like other Bar Associations all over the world, is and has been over the years an autonomous body, with its affairs controlled and managed, subject to the control of the members in General Meeting assembled and by the Rules of the Association, by a Committee comprising of the President, Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer and a number of members (which has kept varying over the years). 

Over the years, outstanding legal luminaries have been installed as Presidents. In the gallery, the names of William Rattigan, J. R. E. Gouldsbury, A. Grey, C. Bevan-Petman, Muhamad Shafi, Bakshi Tek Chand, Moti Sagar, Jagan Nath Agarwal, Mehr Chand Mahajan and Kalifa Shujauddin stand out prominently as Presidents highly esteemed for their great merit and ability and serving three terms or more. The names of Mukand Lal Puri, Fazl-I-Hussain, Gocal Chand Narang, M. Anwar, Manzur Qadir, Mahmud Ali Kasuri, and Miss R. S. Qari will also be remembered, for their manifold services to the Bar. The prestige that the Bar has enjoyed over the year is owed to these and other stalwarts aided by energetic Executive Committees and duly supported by a membership outstanding in its integrity, ability and zeal.

 

MEMBERSHIP

 

Side by side with the above development, can be seen the ever growing increase in membership of the Bar, as reflected by the number of members present at Annual General Meetings. The Annual General Meetings from 1893 to 1902 record the presence of between 17 and 28 members; those from 1930 to 1943, between 70 to 120; from 1947 to 1957, between 40 to 120; from 1958 and onwards, beginning with 150 and gradually rising to 500 in 1966. From the Balance Sheets for the years 1893 to 1902 a total membership between 35 and 50 can be mathematically ascertained. No Balance Sheets thereafter are available, save those for the last few years. The increase in the number of members within the last few years has been astronomical. The total strength in 1966 was 650, in 1979 it was roughly 1100, in 1984 it was roughly 1600 and in 1989 is roughly 2100 and in 1992 it is 3000 and 2001 it is 7073 (Ladies Lawyers 157 and Men Lawyers 6916).

 

BAR ASSOCIATION AS DEFENDER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS

 

In matters pertaining to administrative and executive excesses, where human rights may be trampled upon and where political freedom is subject to tyranny and restraint, a Bar Association, like a barometer, is bound to show violent reaction. it is not always that an enlightened Bar will see eye to eye with Government on important issues, but in voicing its views on Governmental action, paradoxical situations will arise. Notwithstanding this, on all counts, an enlightened Bar is the voice of the people’s conscience and a sentinel of their freedom. It is therefore not unusual for a strong and capable Bar to voice its disapproval to all those activities of Government which border on excesses or which adversely affect the freedom of the individual or his basic rights. 

Further, the function of an enlightened Bar do not merely end with performance of varied functions in the judicial field alone. it must participate in the country’s social welfare and promote and encourage activities beneficial to public interest. It must also fill up he vacuum, where public opinion has become silent or where nation-building activities have become dormant. 

The Lahore High Court Bar Association has, over the years, played an active part in both the fields, namely, in keeping a vigil on Government action bordering on excesses and in promoting and encouraging social welfare work and healthy public activities. 

In 1958, with the coming into force of the Martial Law, the jurisdiction to issue writs remained, subject to limitations, but that to enforce Fundamental Rights was held by the Supreme Court to be non-existent. Even with the passing of the second Constitution Act of Pakistan in 1962, the position was not very bright. On 19th June, 1962, the General House picked up old threads again and called upon the Government that the Fundamental Rights should be made justice able and powers of the Superior Courts to determine the validity of laws made by the Legislature should be restored to them by appropriate amendments made in the Constitution. Pressure from legal and public circles developed such great strength that by 1963, the Central legislature began deliberations to provide for justice ability of the Fundamental Rights. In early 1963 a Bill proposing to amend the Constitution in the said connection was introduced in the National Assembly. On 19th March, 1963, the General House of the Association discussed the Bill and viewed the same with grave concern as it felt that the Bill, if passed, in its existing form, would leave some of the laws, which it considered repressive, intact. It therefore called upon the Government to restore Fundamental Rights as prevailing in the earlier 1956 Constitution and that all existing laws be made subject to such Fundamental Rights and open to the scrutiny of the Courts. Finally, the Constitution (First Amendment) Act, I of 1964, introduced Fundamental Rights in the Constitution, but, however, certain legislation was made immune from justice ability.

 

PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES OF MEMBERS

 

The primary duty of any Bar Association is to keep a vigilant watch on any inroads made into the rights and privileges of its members, both in the judicial field or otherwise. The Lahore High Court Bar Association has always jealously protected the rights and privileges of the legal fraternity in general and its members, in particular, in diverse ways.

 

 

RESTORATION OF THE POWERS OF THE SUPERIOR COURTS,

RULE OF LAW AND DEMOCRACY.

 

Recently the Lahore High Court Bar Association has had to foster and sustain a prolonged movement for the restoration of constitutional rule from 1981 to 1985. As stated earlier, beginning 1981, the President of Pakistan, General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq,  destroyed the powers of the Superior Judiciary, tampered with the Fundamental Rights and the Rule of Law and assumed to himself absolute power. The Lahore High Court Bar Association, in collaboration with other High Court Bar Associations, apart from other political parties, launched a movement for the lifting of the Martial Law, revival of Fundamental Rights, restoration of democracy, the Constitution and the powers and authority of the Superior Courts and for the holding of General elections in the country under the 1973 Constitution. This movement gained strength in 1981 and continued till 1985. The Lahore High Court Bar Association held three successive National Conventions of Lawyers in the years 1982, 1983 and 1984, in which resolutions were adopted for lifting of Martial Law and restoration of Constitution. The Provisional Constitution Order, 1981, whereby the Superior Judiciary had been slaughtered and the Martial Law Authorities had assumed complete supremacy in contravention of the Constitution, was condemned. The attempt on the part of the President to avoid transfer of power and to foist further five year’s dictatorial rule by holding a Referendum on 19th December, 1984, was also condemned. The dissolution of the National and Provincial Assemblies by the President in 1988, in violation of Article 58 of the Constitution, the appointment of the Care Taker Cabinet at the Centre without the Prime Minister, in violation of Article 91, the fixing of a long date for the holding of General elections, in violation of Article 224, and the holding of the elections on non-party basis, in violation of Article 17, were also condemned and the Association demanded that the President hold party based elections within ninety days as required by the Constitution. A number of joint meeting between the Lahore High Court Bar Association and the Lahore District Bar Association were also held in the said connection. It must not be forgotten that but for the lead taken by the Lahore High Court Bar Association, in company with other High Court Bar Associations and political parties, some form of democracy would not have been restored in 1985 and full democracy in 1988. The lawyers, under the leadership of the Lahore High Court Bar Association, thus succeeded, where the political parties had failed, in providing leadership against the Martial Law regime. 

 One of the strongest crusades conducted by the Bar has been with regard to its claim to representation in the highest judiciary in the Province and other judicial offices. The privilege of the Bar’s representation in this respect is an inherent right, founded on ancient usage and established landmarks in the judicial order. A strong Bench or, for that matter, a vigorous judicial service, must draw its talents from the cream of the Bar. The Services do not provide the answer always, for more often than not, seniority and old age place obstacles in the way of that freshness and vigour which is required for sustained and difficult work at the highest intellectual level.  

The Bar Association has always been a vanguard for rule of law and independence of judiciary. It has offered resistance to efforts on the part of successive governments to make appointment of Judges to the Lahore High Court on considerations other than merit. The Bar Association has always felt that since the superior judiciary is the last resort for redress of the grievances of the people, therefore, it should be manned by men whose integrity and competence are beyond question. Spineless and dependent judiciary would be a major tragedy that can happen to the citizens in general and the lawyers in particular.

 

COMPLAINTS AGAINST PUBLIC OFFICIALS ETC.

 

The Bench and the Bar are proverbially two wheels of the same chariot; cognate complementaries to the body politic of that vast and cumbrous process called Administration of justice. Both, therefore, must act in unison and harmony or else the whole legal fabric must crack and the system of justice crumble down. This also goes for the Bar and the representatives of the Government in its administrative and executive agencies. They too must act in harmony for the general good of the country and the welfare of the people, infrequently will occur some too minor to admit of objection; some that are merely accepted and forgotten; some perhaps, that will raise a holocaust and disturb the hornet’s nest. Objectionable behaviour by public savants entrusted with the duty of administering justice and preserving law and order are not all accepted with stoic humility for the mere preservation of good etiquette. Similarly, lack of observance of certain minimum courtesies or failure to meet reasonable demands, do not go all unnoticed. Some find their way to higher circles, to be dealt with a serious way.

 

CONCLUSION

 

On the completion of its hundred years, Lahore High Court Bar Association can look back with satisfaction and pride over its struggle for rule of law, independence of judiciary, and promotion of human rights and civil liberties. It has raised its voice over the years on all questions of national and international importance. It has withstood dictatorial and military regimes with courage and grit and worked relentlessly, in the face of all threats and perils, for the restoration of democracy and constitutional government. Its members and office bearers have courted arrests, suffered detention and made personal sacrifices for upholding its ideals and collective principles. It can look forward proudly towards its next hundred years to build on the foundations of democracy, rule law, independence of judiciary, fundamental rights, and civil liberties, laid down during its first hundred years. 

Footer

| HomeHistory of Bar | Office Bearers | Admin Block | Press Release| Sports & Internet Cafe | Library |

|
Cause ListMedical & Diagnostic Centre  | Resolutions | Inauguration | Contact Us |


 

Copyright © 2008 lhcbar.org. All Rights Reserved.

Site best viewed at a resolution of 800 x 600 pixels